Comment by ActorNightly
1 day ago
I wonder why they allow it at all.
Like its a no brainer to force your employees to use your own models, then RL train them to be better.
1 day ago
I wonder why they allow it at all.
Like its a no brainer to force your employees to use your own models, then RL train them to be better.
Only if all you care about is developing models. I assume the rest of the business would rather just use whatever's best in class regardless of who made it, so I'm sure it's not that straightforward of a decision.
I would say the rest of the business world is looking for price and ROI rather than the best in class.
Those things fall under the 'best in class' calculus for me.
> Only if all you care about is developing models.
Is security no longer a concern?
When you are using a third party model, you are literally feeding it not only your current software but also all the context and work fronts under development.
This is way more than granting a third party access to your internals. This is feeding it in advance updates on all their operations in real time.
Rule 2 security went out the door months ago. Nobody seems to give a shit that all unmonitored agent runs hit the trifecta.
Or let them use Claude, track everything, and use that data to train your own models.
If you assume that noisy general usage data enables good RL, particularly compared to curated RL training sets.
I am not convinced that's the case.