Comment by computerex
1 day ago
I fact checked your claim: https://chatgpt.com/share/6ac6e0a3-9534-83e9-a96f-64fb5f3246...
It's a bit more nuanced than the picture you are painting. I don't condone their behavior if that's what happened. But this post is about a much larger release.
I stand by my argument after reading your fact checking.
The fact checking states:
- OpenAI could not rule out the possibility that private conversations influenced its model. Partly supported - OpenAI actually trained on those private conversations to obtain the method. Unproven
Classifying the second point as unproven is a pedantic sleight of hand. It logically follows that if a model was influenced by a set of data to produce output incorporating it into its analysis it doesn’t really matter if it was “trained”.
Honestly, it shouldn’t even be possible to suspect and be unable to prove. They should be prohibited from using customers data as training data. That is copyright theft and corporate espionage. It wouldn’t be tolerated in other contexts. And it shouldn’t be legal to terms of service their way out of it.
https://youtu.be/GweKOBSJvEY?is=dDmkvcvFSBSJDaFY