Not the time and place to spread what's obviously lies. She might have gotten too much credit for certain things, but the "facts" presented there are twisted or plain wrong (like her not working there until years later).
I think there's truth she gets too much credit for the priority task system (Hal Laning designed it in 62-63, Hamilton did not join until '65), but as far as I can tell the twitter poster is simply wrong:
Not the time and place to spread what's obviously lies. She might have gotten too much credit for certain things, but the "facts" presented there are twisted or plain wrong (like her not working there until years later).
wow, that's a lot of hate and presumption.
"presumption"... or evidence?
I think there's truth she gets too much credit for the priority task system (Hal Laning designed it in 62-63, Hamilton did not join until '65), but as far as I can tell the twitter poster is simply wrong:
https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/blob/master/Comanch...
> # MOD NO. 00 BY M.HAMILTON DEC.12, 1966
https://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/Documents/mit_dev_plan_meetin...
Here is her name in '67 management meeting, not sure how she can be an "entry level hire" in '68, when she's in management meetings in '67?
https://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/Documents/ApolloOrg-Group-23B...
And this has her in charge of CSM Programming on 9/30/68, almost three months before Apollo 8 flew.
[flagged]
on the twitter thread:
"I'm not paying Elon $8 to edit the above tweet."
but they have a verified badge. ok.