Distributing music != recording music != processing music.
There ARE good reasons for recording and processing music at higher bitrates and sample sizes. Effects, especially those with positive feedback loops, can go more unstable and clip and lose information with fewer bits and samples.
There's just no good reason to DISTRIBUTE music at the higher rates.
For what application do you need 96kHz or 192kHz of bandwidth?
Ultrasonic recordings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCQCP-5g5bo
Don't forget about cats and bats, they like music too
Good old FM radio (in stereo) is a 192kHz mux, annoyingly.
How so?
3 replies →
Tuning into time radio signals like DCF77?
See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3668310
Distributing music != recording music != processing music.
There ARE good reasons for recording and processing music at higher bitrates and sample sizes. Effects, especially those with positive feedback loops, can go more unstable and clip and lose information with fewer bits and samples.
There's just no good reason to DISTRIBUTE music at the higher rates.
1 reply →
I'm using an STM32H7, not ESP32. The DAC on the PCM3168A can go up to 192 kHz, but the ADC can only be clocked up to 96 kHz.
What ESP32?