Comment by userbinator

13 hours ago

It's good that Stallman is still alive to experience this world. I think he never would've thought that freedom in software could come in this form, and as a long-time reverser myself, I've always held the opinion that his fixation on source code and the free software movement was not as liberating as it could've been.

"Source code? We don't need no stinkin' source code!"

Pretty sure Stallman would have some choice words to say about his idea of "software freedom" being twisted to include "relying on a corporation's subscription service for all your software needs and being unable to do anything yourself".

  • Give it a few months and open-weight self-hosted models will be able to do similar reverse engineering work. It is an extraordinary future we live in.

    • That doesn't really solve "being unable to do anything yourself", though.

      (It's strange to me how often the "Hacker News" commentariat seems not to value knowing things.)

    • This just plain won't happen. They'll either drive hardware prices through the roof, or heavily regulate open models. Radical changes are coming. It's a bleak, bleak future we live in.

Please explain how this is more liberating than access to source code? Wouldn't this be reliant on continued and cheap access to the models? Even the open weight ones are heavily funded and not out of the kindness of their hearts. Just a few comments down is a thread about being blocked by the usual guardrails from the main providers.

  • But this is access to source code. All source code is now essentially open. If not now, it will be in a few months. You aren't any more dependent on the models then before , you just have the source code of everything that compiles on your computer. What happens in the future is anyone's guess, but for all software published until this point in history, closed source no longer exists.