Comment by fiddlerwoaroof
18 hours ago
It can get even smaller when loose objects get packed into packfiles because of delta compression: a whole bunch of identical files can be stored in minimal overhead over storing one copy.
18 hours ago
It can get even smaller when loose objects get packed into packfiles because of delta compression: a whole bunch of identical files can be stored in minimal overhead over storing one copy.
Right, packfile size is really what matters in the long-term. A tiny change to a file in the short term just adds the whole thing again (compressed), whereas a tiny change in a packfile shouldn't add much at all. Unless you've got very limited disk space, the long-term is the only size that matters.
> whereas a tiny change in a packfile shouldn't add much at all
Well to the extent that git is able to find a suitable delta, which is the difficult part.
I think the 250 files all containing just "foo" are stored as a single blob, too, even before creating a packfile.
I forgot about that, delta compression still can save quite a bit when you have nearly-identical files.
Exactly, a tiny change in a large file produces a full new blob, but is stored very efficiently as a delta in a packfile.