Comment by drooopy

15 hours ago

Recently I went through the list of all of the subs that I follow and 80% of them were all cat related.

Do you think it’s always been that way?

I have gone through a slow attrition of “serious” subs over the years as they’ve all slowly become toxic. I pretty much just have goofy, fun stuff or niche interests left at this point.

  • It’s why I had to give up Reddit entirely.

    Impossible to follow any topic without it devolving into political flame wars.

    • I have stopped visiting Reddit after they dropped support for old.reddit.com. I use lemmy.world now. I did notice an increase in cat posts on Reddit before I quit

      2 replies →

    • The cat bongos thing linked above has a pinned announcement about how if you have the wrong politics, you're not allowed to enjoy cat bongos. lmao

      Maybe it's just a natural process? The Facebook algorithm figured out 10+ years ago the best way to get clicks was to piss people off.

    • > Impossible to follow any topic without it devolving into political flame wars.

      But have you considered how that is Donald Trump/Joe Biden's fault?

      /s in case it isn't obvious.

  • That's how I've treated it too, if a sub has gone from making me happy to making me angry, it's gone, and "cute picture of cats" seems to be more resistant.

  • Cat picture pollution arrived around 2005 with Facebook. Directly driving it was the new idea of a cellphone camera. AOL and the era before it didn't have the cat picture pollution problem because they didn't have the technology to post them.

    • It is not pollution when it is the desirable outcome.

      It isn't like the relevant environment — the set of Internet forums — somehow predates human influence; it is nothing but the sum of human influence.

      Cat pictures at least add joy and mirth, and are driven by real people without outside motivation.

      If anything is pollution in that environment / context, is is the rise of content driven by surveillance capitalism and political corruption.

      At this point (at the risk of turning a measure into a target), might we be able to gauge the natural-ness of a forum by the number of cat pics?

      4 replies →

I've been blocking subs in RES for years now, it's over 7000 last I checked and most I see on /r/all now is cat content. It's GLORIOUS

I never understood the extreme love for cats. I considered getting one for my daughter but the toxoplasmosis alone makes cat ownership an immediate nope and that’s before the cat piss/poop you can immediately smell in a house with cats in them.

  • Cats spent the last 4000 years or so evolving to be more adorable to humans. The reasons we love cats are rooted in our basic cognitive functions, which cats are abusing. I am not taking a piss when I say that people who don't like cats are more likely to be neurodivergent.

  • I prefer animals that shit in a box to animals that eat their own shit and barf it up and eat it again.

    Plus it’s probably the toxoplasmosis that brainwashes us to love those furry little things.

  • The main thing I don’t like about cats is that they feel like they don’t really like their owners but more just tolerate them

    • I don't know what cats you've interacted with, but my cats literally use me as furniture and cry at me when they can't.

    • That’s what I like about cats. I don’t need some dog staring at me constantly looking for direction, my cat has his own agenda that sometimes includes sitting by me.

      I similarly prefer romantic partners with their own stuff going on outside of me vs someone who devotes their entire existence to me and needs to be directed.