Comment by monk_grilla

5 days ago

Why not just get your agent to write LaTeX? Use the beamer template and get a much more professional, customisable, git-commitable and transferable presentation.

10 comments

monk_grilla

Reply
simonw  5 days ago

You inspired me to knock together a LaTeX version of the same pattern - lets you drop LaTeX in the URL so you can link to the rendered version.

https://tools.simonwillison.net/latex

gf000  4 days ago

Then why not typst? Much faster to render and far more ergonomic/human-understandable when you eventually have to touch something inside.

  • monk_grilla  3 days ago

    I prefer to get bleeding edge LLMs to use old, time-hardened technologies. They are more stable, I trust they're not going to change out from under me, and it is more transferable. The ergonomics of the actual markup don't matter to me, since I'm not writing it, so I'd rather the more powerful, more training data option.

    Just one example: Every university and academic publication in the world give LaTeX formatting templates, examples courses etc.

    • gf000  3 days ago

      Ergonomics matter even for LLMs. Also, compile speed, quality of error messages, how easy it is to get something right (especially that LLMs are "blind" unless you want to burn a lots of tokens, so they sort of just reason without the visual output) absolutely matter and can turn a one-shot LLM prompt into a multi-turn agent churning wasting tokens for no good reason.

      I'm not saying that it's necessarily the case here, but typst is past the very early phase and LLMs are decent at generating it. Also, many formatting templates have been converted to typst as well.