Comment by hsuduebc2
5 days ago
Organized groups which are created historically as opposition to another organized groups are bad idea or these are made up too?
5 days ago
Organized groups which are created historically as opposition to another organized groups are bad idea or these are made up too?
Yes it's a bad idea. Everyone should just think individually; "is this fiction working for me personally?" If the answer is no, then you shouldn't support it. If the people from some other organized group which "threatens you" are so brainwashed that they think they benefit from their humongous group (when in fact, they're just treated as a meaningless, tiny number), then you may have to bare the pain of their idiocy for a few generations or so until their masters exploit them out of existence. It's an unfortunate situation. The sheep get slaughtered, but unlike sheep, you can't force the sheeple to breed; and they don't; deep down they know how miserable their existence is.
In reality, the group has little power over you as an individual. It derives most of its power from your own compliance. The compliance of others is a lesser factor in your oppression.
You don't need to believe in alternative fictions unless you created it. You just need to wait it out and pretend hard! Create your own fiction, exploit every loophole! Let the idiots realize their idiocy on their own and rebel on their own later once they realize they were fooled. You have to be a radical realist, wait it out and bare all the costs in the meantime. It's better to bare the pain of system dysfunction for decades than to go along with it and find yourself at the front of the firing line later, fighting against what you helped to create.
>In reality, the group has little power over you as an individual.
I'm sure everyone in Ukraine is delighted that the nightly air raids are a mere narrative device, and they can choose to opt out of them by pretending hard.
They can leave! Escape the country through some forest.
And yes, drones are a kind of tangible narrative device. If people didn't believe the narrative, they would just have 'surrendered' on day one of the war and the drones would never have been sent. They're just not smart enough and too proud.
French people are the smartest in that respect. Look at how many times they surrendered and look at how big France is still. France has territories all over the world and a dominant culture. They lost essentially every major war but haven't lost a thing in practice.
I wonder if Germans even learned the lesson yet... They have plenty of evidence to look at in their case. They're smart but also a bit gullible and their pride gets in the way. Heck, even a backward country like Iraq or Afghanistan can lose a war to the world's #1 superpower and still manage to keep everything.
How can anyone see this and believe that fighting a war makes sense? Most people are retarded and gullible.