Comment by 72deluxe 4 days ago Imagine if there were already existing ones like QuickJS... 2 comments 72deluxe Reply fg137 4 days ago They intentionally skipped QuickJS because it's "too complicated" (paraphrasing) which I think is a decision they'll regret. 72deluxe 3 days ago Yes that sounds odd. There' quickjs-ng I think which is an effort to speed it up and modernise it, so why not use an existing effort that works? Lots of wheel reinvention occurring with these LLM teams.
fg137 4 days ago They intentionally skipped QuickJS because it's "too complicated" (paraphrasing) which I think is a decision they'll regret. 72deluxe 3 days ago Yes that sounds odd. There' quickjs-ng I think which is an effort to speed it up and modernise it, so why not use an existing effort that works? Lots of wheel reinvention occurring with these LLM teams.
72deluxe 3 days ago Yes that sounds odd. There' quickjs-ng I think which is an effort to speed it up and modernise it, so why not use an existing effort that works? Lots of wheel reinvention occurring with these LLM teams.
They intentionally skipped QuickJS because it's "too complicated" (paraphrasing) which I think is a decision they'll regret.
Yes that sounds odd. There' quickjs-ng I think which is an effort to speed it up and modernise it, so why not use an existing effort that works? Lots of wheel reinvention occurring with these LLM teams.