Comment by pjmlp 4 days ago Since this is for C++26, you use modules. 2 comments pjmlp Reply nananana9 3 days ago I live mostly in the real world, unfortunately.If new major C++ features will require modules in order to work, I may as well stop following the specs. pjmlp 3 days ago In the real world, VC++ and clang with MSBuild, CMake/ninja already have good modules support, GCC 16 only has a few issues to iron out.By the time C++26 actually becomes available, all three major compilers will already have good modules support.Anyone using recent Office versions, is a consumer of a product that makes use of C++ modules today.
nananana9 3 days ago I live mostly in the real world, unfortunately.If new major C++ features will require modules in order to work, I may as well stop following the specs. pjmlp 3 days ago In the real world, VC++ and clang with MSBuild, CMake/ninja already have good modules support, GCC 16 only has a few issues to iron out.By the time C++26 actually becomes available, all three major compilers will already have good modules support.Anyone using recent Office versions, is a consumer of a product that makes use of C++ modules today.
pjmlp 3 days ago In the real world, VC++ and clang with MSBuild, CMake/ninja already have good modules support, GCC 16 only has a few issues to iron out.By the time C++26 actually becomes available, all three major compilers will already have good modules support.Anyone using recent Office versions, is a consumer of a product that makes use of C++ modules today.
I live mostly in the real world, unfortunately.
If new major C++ features will require modules in order to work, I may as well stop following the specs.
In the real world, VC++ and clang with MSBuild, CMake/ninja already have good modules support, GCC 16 only has a few issues to iron out.
By the time C++26 actually becomes available, all three major compilers will already have good modules support.
Anyone using recent Office versions, is a consumer of a product that makes use of C++ modules today.