Comment by 0c3ca83 3 days ago You're arguing with an LLM. 3 comments 0c3ca83 Reply polynomial 3 days ago > & then spent the next four years walking them back one piece at a timeI feel like the meat proxy changed "and" to '&' here; LLMs don't use ampersands like that, presumably because it's not really grammatically correct.But the rest of the phrase itself is very obvious AI slop. win311fwg 3 days ago You make it sound as if implementation details matter. They don't. crabmusket 2 days ago [flagged]
polynomial 3 days ago > & then spent the next four years walking them back one piece at a timeI feel like the meat proxy changed "and" to '&' here; LLMs don't use ampersands like that, presumably because it's not really grammatically correct.But the rest of the phrase itself is very obvious AI slop.
> & then spent the next four years walking them back one piece at a time
I feel like the meat proxy changed "and" to '&' here; LLMs don't use ampersands like that, presumably because it's not really grammatically correct.
But the rest of the phrase itself is very obvious AI slop.
You make it sound as if implementation details matter. They don't.
[flagged]