Comment by baranul

3 days ago

What the music and movie industry did and does, in regards to IP, is the counter-example.

This is software, not media. Different laws apply. Unix and GNU mirrored 1:1 (and extended) a commercial, propietary OS (different Unix flavours). With FVWM + LessTif + gcc you basically had a reimplemented Unix workstation at home.

Bash, GCC, *utils, X.org, LessTif, ZIP vs PKZIP...

Also, every libre Smalltalk IDE out there had the virtual UI as the propietary ones.

Also, FreeDOS in the 90's and DOSEmu. Same virtual interface and usage.

  • Law applies to software too. Contract law (EULA) and copyright are applicable. Many EULAs have statements on reverse engineering. Another aspect of this is unfair competition or competing directly against the product the offending software was copied from.

    Violations of the EULA or copyright can result in having to fight it out in court. It's a matter of if it will be taken to court (as little guys may not have the time or lawyers) or can be that both parties have decided on some type of agreement.

    • Again, you are like 40 years late, or maybe 50:

      - Whole Unix clones, kernel and userland

      - Unix userland utility clones

      - Unix compiler and linker packs. Tons of them.

      - Unix UI clones 99% close to the original API

      By 2000/2001 you could run most GL accelerated stuff under MESA+DRI just fine as if it were an SGI machine, even replacing propietary Motif with LessTif.

      - Windows API clones, both for running and compiling software, with WineLib+WineGCC or MinGW.

      - Windows clones, ReactOS from GIT can be fairly complete.

      - NextStep/Cocoa clones. Currently tons of software made for OSX 10.6 (in a libre way) can be compiled with both GNUStep+Addons and with XCode.

      1 reply →