Comment by jerf 3 days ago Ah, the classic "picture is worth a thousand words" move. Well played. 4 comments jerf Reply dofm 3 days ago I could have picked a considerably worse face, too.But this is a painting of his own young son, Jean (who went on to be a legendary director, screenwriter, actor).So one presumes there's a method in it, because nobody hates a kid that much. mosselman 3 days ago Is that a phone he is holding? dofm 3 days ago No, it's a 13" tablet. blitzar 2 days ago I am a philistine when it comes to turn of the century art - but I am fairly certain that is an iPhone duo
dofm 3 days ago I could have picked a considerably worse face, too.But this is a painting of his own young son, Jean (who went on to be a legendary director, screenwriter, actor).So one presumes there's a method in it, because nobody hates a kid that much.
mosselman 3 days ago Is that a phone he is holding? dofm 3 days ago No, it's a 13" tablet. blitzar 2 days ago I am a philistine when it comes to turn of the century art - but I am fairly certain that is an iPhone duo
dofm 3 days ago No, it's a 13" tablet. blitzar 2 days ago I am a philistine when it comes to turn of the century art - but I am fairly certain that is an iPhone duo
blitzar 2 days ago I am a philistine when it comes to turn of the century art - but I am fairly certain that is an iPhone duo
I could have picked a considerably worse face, too.
But this is a painting of his own young son, Jean (who went on to be a legendary director, screenwriter, actor).
So one presumes there's a method in it, because nobody hates a kid that much.
Is that a phone he is holding?
No, it's a 13" tablet.
I am a philistine when it comes to turn of the century art - but I am fairly certain that is an iPhone duo