Comment by probably_wrong

3 days ago

I have a petty complaint: if you name your social network after a core Unix concept, then why make your users login exclusively through a Microsoft subsidiary?

GitHub is a social network already. You’re logging into one social network with another social network. And I’m complaining about that fact on a different social network. What has the world come to?

  • Why do want your access to one social network be dependent on your access ti another social network?

    Didn’t enough account bans happen to see that’s a bad idea?

Based on the branding, I think their target demographic assumes the dev in /dev/null is short for "Developers"

  • It's a cute name, but considering how combative developers can be about naming, I think it should have been more clever than cute.

    If 'dev' is developer, 'null' makes me think it's for worthless developers, or for things that developers don't care about.

    • Well it is a social media site, isn’t that where everybody puts the things they don’t care about?

Is this a real question? If so, here’s a real answer:

GitHub is the single most widely adopted, developer-specific OIDC identity provider.

If it’s facetious, then WSL BABYYYYYY

Good point.

What if Microsoft black listed me from GitHub forever? I'm also banned from Facebook for like decade