Comment by to11mtm

1 day ago

> RAW files are a pain to deal with,

RAW can be it's own entire nasty^nasty rabbit hole. The sorts of stuff that honestly do make me wonder if certain raw formats have their own unique ways of exposing vulnerabilities in accepted ways of implementing.

Things that come to mind are;

- Compressed RAW images. Both the lossless and lossy variants, esp because every manufacturer does their own thing, well except maybe MFT[0], buuuut;

-For MFT, my understanding is that the RAW doesn't just contain some info for LR/C1/DPL[1] or any other sufficiently implemented processing tool to apply correction data (again, I could be wrong, but I think that is something that the Micro 4/3 format does.)

[0] - Micro 4/3

[1] Light room, Capture One, DXO PhotoLab (FKA DXO OpticsPro)

I'd say I'm rather well-versed in this topic but I have a really hard time following what you're saying. Could you attempt rephrasing?

MFT is a sensor size and lens mount, not a raw file format. Panasonic and Olympus (among others) have made cameras using this standard, but use different raw file formats.