Comment by dotancohen

1 day ago

After I stopped letting Claude run tests, my token usage went from "gone by Wednesday" to "what can I automate this Saturday so my tokens won't go to waste".

Thanks this is very helpful, i didn't realize that. But not sure what to do since running tests is how Claude often catches mistakes and iterates. If i run them myself, the cache will still expire.

However where i think you have a point is that it tends to run tests quite casually where a reviewer would have been enough to catch mistakes.

IMHO, the real problem is the 5min cache way too small. They should up it to 1 hour.

What is the reason for this? Surely running tests by itself isn't necessarily token-expensive? And it provides cheap feedback for the agent: to see whether they're breaking things.

  • My guess is that the LLM (usually Sonnet or Opus in my case) is burning tokens polling to see if the output finished - and there is often a lot of it. My current project is Rust, Python, and Kotlin for what it's worth.

    I don't actually know the real mechanism, I came across this serendipitously.

How do you do that?

  • I just told it that I want to run the tests, because so much of the code was vibed at that point and I felt I was losing understanding of the application. A few days of that and I could see that my token use was much lower than usual. Going back to LLM-run testing returned the high token usage.