Comment by greesil 21 hours ago You can just read Bad Blood, too, and skip the movie / hyperbole/ whatever 8 comments greesil Reply mjg59 17 hours ago They're incredibly different things telling different stories. One doesn't replace the other. xdavidliu 11 hours ago your parent comment just wanted to get a shot of serotonin by chiming and showing off that they've read (or are merely aware of) the book greesil 11 hours ago No greesil 11 hours ago Incredibly different? It defies credulity? mjg59 10 hours ago Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand. 1 reply → cm2012 9 hours ago Documentaries and video in general are just dramatically, intensely worse mediums for communicating factual learnings compared to books and text in general. Capricorn2481 9 hours ago If you're going into a Nathan Fielder documentary expecting a funnel of factual information, you must not know who that is.
mjg59 17 hours ago They're incredibly different things telling different stories. One doesn't replace the other. xdavidliu 11 hours ago your parent comment just wanted to get a shot of serotonin by chiming and showing off that they've read (or are merely aware of) the book greesil 11 hours ago No greesil 11 hours ago Incredibly different? It defies credulity? mjg59 10 hours ago Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand. 1 reply →
xdavidliu 11 hours ago your parent comment just wanted to get a shot of serotonin by chiming and showing off that they've read (or are merely aware of) the book greesil 11 hours ago No
greesil 11 hours ago Incredibly different? It defies credulity? mjg59 10 hours ago Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand. 1 reply →
mjg59 10 hours ago Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand. 1 reply →
cm2012 9 hours ago Documentaries and video in general are just dramatically, intensely worse mediums for communicating factual learnings compared to books and text in general. Capricorn2481 9 hours ago If you're going into a Nathan Fielder documentary expecting a funnel of factual information, you must not know who that is.
Capricorn2481 9 hours ago If you're going into a Nathan Fielder documentary expecting a funnel of factual information, you must not know who that is.
They're incredibly different things telling different stories. One doesn't replace the other.
your parent comment just wanted to get a shot of serotonin by chiming and showing off that they've read (or are merely aware of) the book
No
Incredibly different? It defies credulity?
Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand.
1 reply →
Documentaries and video in general are just dramatically, intensely worse mediums for communicating factual learnings compared to books and text in general.
If you're going into a Nathan Fielder documentary expecting a funnel of factual information, you must not know who that is.