← Back to context Comment by greesil 20 hours ago You can just read Bad Blood, too, and skip the movie / hyperbole/ whatever 8 comments greesil Reply mjg59 16 hours ago They're incredibly different things telling different stories. One doesn't replace the other. xdavidliu 10 hours ago your parent comment just wanted to get a shot of serotonin by chiming and showing off that they've read (or are merely aware of) the book greesil 9 hours ago No greesil 9 hours ago Incredibly different? It defies credulity? mjg59 8 hours ago Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand. 1 reply → cm2012 8 hours ago Documentaries and video in general are just dramatically, intensely worse mediums for communicating factual learnings compared to books and text in general. Capricorn2481 7 hours ago If you're going into a Nathan Fielder documentary expecting a funnel of factual information, you must not know who that is.
mjg59 16 hours ago They're incredibly different things telling different stories. One doesn't replace the other. xdavidliu 10 hours ago your parent comment just wanted to get a shot of serotonin by chiming and showing off that they've read (or are merely aware of) the book greesil 9 hours ago No greesil 9 hours ago Incredibly different? It defies credulity? mjg59 8 hours ago Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand. 1 reply →
xdavidliu 10 hours ago your parent comment just wanted to get a shot of serotonin by chiming and showing off that they've read (or are merely aware of) the book greesil 9 hours ago No
greesil 9 hours ago Incredibly different? It defies credulity? mjg59 8 hours ago Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand. 1 reply →
mjg59 8 hours ago Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand. 1 reply →
cm2012 8 hours ago Documentaries and video in general are just dramatically, intensely worse mediums for communicating factual learnings compared to books and text in general. Capricorn2481 7 hours ago If you're going into a Nathan Fielder documentary expecting a funnel of factual information, you must not know who that is.
Capricorn2481 7 hours ago If you're going into a Nathan Fielder documentary expecting a funnel of factual information, you must not know who that is.
They're incredibly different things telling different stories. One doesn't replace the other.
your parent comment just wanted to get a shot of serotonin by chiming and showing off that they've read (or are merely aware of) the book
No
Incredibly different? It defies credulity?
Yes. The degree to which this presents a different experience is one I would not have found credible beforehand.
1 reply →
Documentaries and video in general are just dramatically, intensely worse mediums for communicating factual learnings compared to books and text in general.
If you're going into a Nathan Fielder documentary expecting a funnel of factual information, you must not know who that is.