Comment by CodeCompost 13 hours ago That is awesome. I take it I can't run this with nVidia. 4 comments CodeCompost Reply ninjin 13 hours ago Nvidia support for OpenBSD is not really a thing [1]. With AMD and Intel, you have support for modern hardware in the tree [2,3].[1]: https://man.openbsd.org/nv[2]: https://man.openbsd.org/amdgpu[3]: https://man.openbsd.org/intel XenophileJKO 12 hours ago The irony is that this seems like the perfect kind of problem to say point an Opus 5.5 instance at.It is verifiable and has a clear exit criteria. Functional and performance parity. ninjin 12 hours ago How is that ironic? If you know how to do this, ensure that the license of the code is compatible [1], and maintain the code, then send the patch to tech@ for review and maybe it gets in.[1]: https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html 1 reply →
ninjin 13 hours ago Nvidia support for OpenBSD is not really a thing [1]. With AMD and Intel, you have support for modern hardware in the tree [2,3].[1]: https://man.openbsd.org/nv[2]: https://man.openbsd.org/amdgpu[3]: https://man.openbsd.org/intel XenophileJKO 12 hours ago The irony is that this seems like the perfect kind of problem to say point an Opus 5.5 instance at.It is verifiable and has a clear exit criteria. Functional and performance parity. ninjin 12 hours ago How is that ironic? If you know how to do this, ensure that the license of the code is compatible [1], and maintain the code, then send the patch to tech@ for review and maybe it gets in.[1]: https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html 1 reply →
XenophileJKO 12 hours ago The irony is that this seems like the perfect kind of problem to say point an Opus 5.5 instance at.It is verifiable and has a clear exit criteria. Functional and performance parity. ninjin 12 hours ago How is that ironic? If you know how to do this, ensure that the license of the code is compatible [1], and maintain the code, then send the patch to tech@ for review and maybe it gets in.[1]: https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html 1 reply →
ninjin 12 hours ago How is that ironic? If you know how to do this, ensure that the license of the code is compatible [1], and maintain the code, then send the patch to tech@ for review and maybe it gets in.[1]: https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html 1 reply →
Nvidia support for OpenBSD is not really a thing [1]. With AMD and Intel, you have support for modern hardware in the tree [2,3].
[1]: https://man.openbsd.org/nv
[2]: https://man.openbsd.org/amdgpu
[3]: https://man.openbsd.org/intel
The irony is that this seems like the perfect kind of problem to say point an Opus 5.5 instance at.
It is verifiable and has a clear exit criteria. Functional and performance parity.
How is that ironic? If you know how to do this, ensure that the license of the code is compatible [1], and maintain the code, then send the patch to tech@ for review and maybe it gets in.
[1]: https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
1 reply →