Comment by nilamo

6 hours ago

They can't sue everyone, comrade. AI tools will hopefully trigger a rewrite of what copyright means, it's always been silly that it prevents derivitive works.

> AI tools will hopefully trigger a rewrite of what copyright means,

Maybe it will, but this ain't a copyright issues, it's a trademark issue.

  • It's a legal issue, and the legal part has always been bullshit regardless of which specific label happens to apply.

    • If you don't make copyright contagious under derivative works then people can just change a few things to get around copyright.

      Also, do you really want a world where big film studios can just adapt books of writers without compensating them?

      2 replies →

    • Surprised to see this level of discourse here on HN, reads like a reddit comment.

      Copyright sucks, and Disney is bad etc, but how is using StarCraft and its assets in your random AI game okay?

      I mean, creators should be allowed to exert control over how their assets and brand are used.

      7 replies →

Couldn’t they just use AI to sue at scale? No one should be too small to go after now.

  • Yeah the law firms just haven't caught up yet. But they will.

    • And when the judges get around to the case in 300 years after all the other ai court cases, we'll be beyond caring about the consequences.

    • Law firms are cautious about AI tools, they got burned a couple years ago by hallucinated citations.

      Citing made-up cases sure looks like lying to the court, which is a punishable offense. Lawyers have been sanctioned, fined, and in one case received a 30-day license suspension.

When it comes to copyright, I am not so optimistic. When the AI bubble bursts, the usual corporate interests will resurface with a vengeance.