Comment by charcircuit 7 days ago A service is not a product. You are mixing things up. 4 comments charcircuit Reply 233mhz 7 days ago uh? A model isn't a service either> Notice of Order Regarding Exclusion and Removal of DeepSeek Productsdeepseek 4.1 flash definitely is a product "developed by Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd (DeepSeek)"How's that even debatable lmao? charcircuit 7 days ago I am talking about an American company selling deepseek inference as a service.Also since the model is open source you wouldn't need to go through procurement to obtain it anyways. 233mhz 7 days ago They're still using a deepseek product, which is explicitly banned 1 reply →
233mhz 7 days ago uh? A model isn't a service either> Notice of Order Regarding Exclusion and Removal of DeepSeek Productsdeepseek 4.1 flash definitely is a product "developed by Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd (DeepSeek)"How's that even debatable lmao? charcircuit 7 days ago I am talking about an American company selling deepseek inference as a service.Also since the model is open source you wouldn't need to go through procurement to obtain it anyways. 233mhz 7 days ago They're still using a deepseek product, which is explicitly banned 1 reply →
charcircuit 7 days ago I am talking about an American company selling deepseek inference as a service.Also since the model is open source you wouldn't need to go through procurement to obtain it anyways. 233mhz 7 days ago They're still using a deepseek product, which is explicitly banned 1 reply →
uh? A model isn't a service either
> Notice of Order Regarding Exclusion and Removal of DeepSeek Products
deepseek 4.1 flash definitely is a product "developed by Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd (DeepSeek)"
How's that even debatable lmao?
I am talking about an American company selling deepseek inference as a service.
Also since the model is open source you wouldn't need to go through procurement to obtain it anyways.
They're still using a deepseek product, which is explicitly banned
1 reply →