Comment by cute_boi 11 hours ago The irony is the article is very sloppy. Can we at least write it and review it properly.. 4 comments cute_boi Reply antipaul 10 hours ago This is true. I was unfamiliar with this concept (I use codex/claude daily), and am trying to get to the "bottom line".Oh, it's there at bottom under "my takeaway". But I still didn't get it initially.Slop Code Bench? Need a Slop Writing Bench too jampekka 11 hours ago What's wrong with it? Reads fine to me. a3w 9 hours ago There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was.That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.
antipaul 10 hours ago This is true. I was unfamiliar with this concept (I use codex/claude daily), and am trying to get to the "bottom line".Oh, it's there at bottom under "my takeaway". But I still didn't get it initially.Slop Code Bench? Need a Slop Writing Bench too
jampekka 11 hours ago What's wrong with it? Reads fine to me. a3w 9 hours ago There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was.That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.
a3w 9 hours ago There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was.That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.
This is true. I was unfamiliar with this concept (I use codex/claude daily), and am trying to get to the "bottom line".
Oh, it's there at bottom under "my takeaway". But I still didn't get it initially.
Slop Code Bench? Need a Slop Writing Bench too
What's wrong with it? Reads fine to me.
There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was.
That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.