← Back to context Comment by cute_boi 8 hours ago The irony is the article is very sloppy. Can we at least write it and review it properly.. 4 comments cute_boi Reply antipaul 8 hours ago This is true. I was unfamiliar with this concept (I use codex/claude daily), and am trying to get to the "bottom line".Oh, it's there at bottom under "my takeaway". But I still didn't get it initially.Slop Code Bench? Need a Slop Writing Bench too jampekka 8 hours ago What's wrong with it? Reads fine to me. a3w 7 hours ago There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was.That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.
antipaul 8 hours ago This is true. I was unfamiliar with this concept (I use codex/claude daily), and am trying to get to the "bottom line".Oh, it's there at bottom under "my takeaway". But I still didn't get it initially.Slop Code Bench? Need a Slop Writing Bench too
jampekka 8 hours ago What's wrong with it? Reads fine to me. a3w 7 hours ago There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was.That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.
a3w 7 hours ago There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was.That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.
This is true. I was unfamiliar with this concept (I use codex/claude daily), and am trying to get to the "bottom line".
Oh, it's there at bottom under "my takeaway". But I still didn't get it initially.
Slop Code Bench? Need a Slop Writing Bench too
What's wrong with it? Reads fine to me.
There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was.
That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.