Comment by throwaway_20161 7 hours ago And what makes you trust them, with the “gun”? 4 comments throwaway_20161 Reply red75prime 7 hours ago It's less likely to have an omnicidal maniac in a group of 100 people than in a group of a few billion people. yunnpp 6 hours ago That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group. red75prime 1 hour ago Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet. xvector 5 hours ago No, this is just basic probability.
red75prime 7 hours ago It's less likely to have an omnicidal maniac in a group of 100 people than in a group of a few billion people. yunnpp 6 hours ago That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group. red75prime 1 hour ago Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet. xvector 5 hours ago No, this is just basic probability.
yunnpp 6 hours ago That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group. red75prime 1 hour ago Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet. xvector 5 hours ago No, this is just basic probability.
red75prime 1 hour ago Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet.
It's less likely to have an omnicidal maniac in a group of 100 people than in a group of a few billion people.
That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group.
Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet.
No, this is just basic probability.