← Back to context Comment by throwaway_20161 11 hours ago And what makes you trust them, with the “gun”? 4 comments throwaway_20161 Reply red75prime 10 hours ago It's less likely to have an omnicidal maniac in a group of 100 people than in a group of a few billion people. yunnpp 10 hours ago That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group. red75prime 5 hours ago Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet. xvector 9 hours ago No, this is just basic probability.
red75prime 10 hours ago It's less likely to have an omnicidal maniac in a group of 100 people than in a group of a few billion people. yunnpp 10 hours ago That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group. red75prime 5 hours ago Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet. xvector 9 hours ago No, this is just basic probability.
yunnpp 10 hours ago That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group. red75prime 5 hours ago Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet. xvector 9 hours ago No, this is just basic probability.
red75prime 5 hours ago Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet.
It's less likely to have an omnicidal maniac in a group of 100 people than in a group of a few billion people.
That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group.
Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet.
No, this is just basic probability.