Comment by Roark66
15 hours ago
Interesting. Do they have Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Although "westernised" is a bad word to use. There is nothing "Western" about this. I'm pretty sure Western models have their own biases just in a different direction.
We already have right names for it. It's called uncensored.
Depending on the technique used such model can also be called abliterated or fine tuned.
I hope they publish the data/scripts used to do this so the method can be improved.
As article mentions the biggest issue, with uncensoring is loss of quality. Some loss is impossible to be avoided, but it can be minimised.
> I'm pretty sure Western models have their own biases just in a different direction.
This statement warrants testing.
If we don't see an equivalent study out in a few days saying that this is true, it's clearly false. The methodology of the study was clear and easy to replicate (in short order, though you'll need the hardware/money for tokens). No reason why other groups shouldn't be performing the same exact tests with Western models (open weights or not).
Are you going to perform the work? If not, why do you expect someone else will?
Because these are ads. He may not have a company marketing products in this space, but others do.
1 reply →
If we don't see an equivalent study out in a few days saying that this is true, it's clearly false.
Yeah, that's not how evidence works, bud.