Comment by indigo945
1 day ago
It's not that their argument is wrong or not worth discussing, it's that it is utterly irrelevant when the question at stake is whether the math is valid and useful or not. It's effectively whataboutism.
1 day ago
It's not that their argument is wrong or not worth discussing, it's that it is utterly irrelevant when the question at stake is whether the math is valid and useful or not. It's effectively whataboutism.
I think sometimes it's worth being concerned about something else. What about "this" is valid if the "this" is important to us.
Everything is potentially interconnected.
What separates things is course-graining, not ontological separation per se.