Comment by johncolanduoni 6 hours ago How do you suggest they provide the static compression dictionary? 2 comments johncolanduoni Reply userbinator 6 hours ago You don't. Any real compression algorithm, including all the other standard ones, doesn't need such a thing. Dylan16807 2 hours ago Many compression formats support static dictionaries, and for a good reason. Short messages don't compress well. If you know a bunch of common data for a context, you can make the first several kilobytes compress a lot better.
userbinator 6 hours ago You don't. Any real compression algorithm, including all the other standard ones, doesn't need such a thing. Dylan16807 2 hours ago Many compression formats support static dictionaries, and for a good reason. Short messages don't compress well. If you know a bunch of common data for a context, you can make the first several kilobytes compress a lot better.
Dylan16807 2 hours ago Many compression formats support static dictionaries, and for a good reason. Short messages don't compress well. If you know a bunch of common data for a context, you can make the first several kilobytes compress a lot better.
You don't. Any real compression algorithm, including all the other standard ones, doesn't need such a thing.
Many compression formats support static dictionaries, and for a good reason. Short messages don't compress well. If you know a bunch of common data for a context, you can make the first several kilobytes compress a lot better.