Comment by PostOnce
2 hours ago
So what are they going to review the slop in? Or are they just not gonna bother checking?
We are gonna see some Knight Capital level fuckups shortly.
2 hours ago
So what are they going to review the slop in? Or are they just not gonna bother checking?
We are gonna see some Knight Capital level fuckups shortly.
I've been an emacs user for most of my life, before I even went to college. I took a brief (5 years) tour into IDEs for writing code on the job, but the moment agents became a viable way to develop code I switched back into emacs. I love reviewing changes in magit.
I'm pretty sure many folks put up with the bloat of IDEs just for the functionality they offered. Now, they're hopping back to emacs, vim, sublime, whatever their heart desires.
Controversial take: Looking at lines of code is no longer a feasible task. Also it adds very little to quality for large swathes of user facing functionality. Instead focussing that much time on building a robust test suite is a better application of developer time.
Agreed. I get the best outcomes out of agents when I use them as essentially autocomplete.
"Render what I was thinking"
I just double check to make sure it aligns
>Or are they just not gonna bother checking?
They're not going to bother checking. It simply isn't going to be possible for humans to review code in the future where all code is being written by machines, and not having all code be written by machines is not an option.
Hell in the future LLMs probably won't even work with "code" at all, just bytecode directly, using some format created by and optimized for LLMs. Why even bother with text when no human will ever lay eyes on it?
>We are gonna see some Knight Capital level fuckups shortly.
Yes, but humans fuck up too so it doesn't matter. Future go brrr.
Trying to review slop code by eye is as productive as using pencil and paper to check address arithmetic in assembly from a compiler.