Comment by cowlevel 10 hours ago How is letting more people vote corruption? I'd say it's corruption whenever anyone can't vote. 5 comments cowlevel Reply matheusmoreira 10 hours ago Everyone had more than enough time to vote. The courts said that verbatim back in 2022. Why change opinion now? cowlevel 9 hours ago Last week my mom said we didn't have any orange juice. This week she said we have orange juice. Why the change? matheusmoreira 9 hours ago You think a supreme court judge, who was once the candidate's lawyer, ignoring his own court's precedents, to try and help said candidate, is in the same conceptual space as your mom being confused? 1 reply → Rapzid 5 hours ago She must corrupt. Is the door dash driver her ex personal attorney?
matheusmoreira 10 hours ago Everyone had more than enough time to vote. The courts said that verbatim back in 2022. Why change opinion now? cowlevel 9 hours ago Last week my mom said we didn't have any orange juice. This week she said we have orange juice. Why the change? matheusmoreira 9 hours ago You think a supreme court judge, who was once the candidate's lawyer, ignoring his own court's precedents, to try and help said candidate, is in the same conceptual space as your mom being confused? 1 reply → Rapzid 5 hours ago She must corrupt. Is the door dash driver her ex personal attorney?
cowlevel 9 hours ago Last week my mom said we didn't have any orange juice. This week she said we have orange juice. Why the change? matheusmoreira 9 hours ago You think a supreme court judge, who was once the candidate's lawyer, ignoring his own court's precedents, to try and help said candidate, is in the same conceptual space as your mom being confused? 1 reply → Rapzid 5 hours ago She must corrupt. Is the door dash driver her ex personal attorney?
matheusmoreira 9 hours ago You think a supreme court judge, who was once the candidate's lawyer, ignoring his own court's precedents, to try and help said candidate, is in the same conceptual space as your mom being confused? 1 reply →
Everyone had more than enough time to vote. The courts said that verbatim back in 2022. Why change opinion now?
Last week my mom said we didn't have any orange juice. This week she said we have orange juice. Why the change?
You think a supreme court judge, who was once the candidate's lawyer, ignoring his own court's precedents, to try and help said candidate, is in the same conceptual space as your mom being confused?
1 reply →
She must corrupt. Is the door dash driver her ex personal attorney?