Comment by dude250711 21 hours ago And no, blog writers, it is not heralding "The Diamond Age". 5 comments dude250711 Reply notarobot123 17 hours ago I don't know... LLMs, drones, culture wars, nostalgia for monarchical rule - we're only really missing the replicators and nano-engineering at this point. specialist 1 hour ago Yes and: I still think Stephensen's notion of phyles will prove the most prescient.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age overtone1000 10 hours ago I'll save my "Minecraft had it right all along" headline for a other day. Tepix 21 hours ago Recommended reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age db48x 20 hours ago Way better to recommend reading the book instead of the Wikipedia page about the book.
notarobot123 17 hours ago I don't know... LLMs, drones, culture wars, nostalgia for monarchical rule - we're only really missing the replicators and nano-engineering at this point. specialist 1 hour ago Yes and: I still think Stephensen's notion of phyles will prove the most prescient.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age
specialist 1 hour ago Yes and: I still think Stephensen's notion of phyles will prove the most prescient.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age
Tepix 21 hours ago Recommended reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age db48x 20 hours ago Way better to recommend reading the book instead of the Wikipedia page about the book.
db48x 20 hours ago Way better to recommend reading the book instead of the Wikipedia page about the book.
I don't know... LLMs, drones, culture wars, nostalgia for monarchical rule - we're only really missing the replicators and nano-engineering at this point.
Yes and: I still think Stephensen's notion of phyles will prove the most prescient.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age
I'll save my "Minecraft had it right all along" headline for a other day.
Recommended reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age
Way better to recommend reading the book instead of the Wikipedia page about the book.