Comment by vintagedave
8 hours ago
This is how an AI-assisted article should be: they used AI to decompile, find things out (with some very interesting techniques listed at the top of the article) but the article itself is human-written. It shows they used AI to help themselves understand, not used AI to do everything.
How do you know it's human-written?
Not OP, but I have to agree with them. The text just makes too much sense. There's no irrelevant shit tossed in for no reason, and I'm not really seeing any annoying LLM-isms.
Of course, I might be wrong.
i think its heavily edited, but there is a definite LLM influence
> the named animation sequence
noone abused verbs like this in the before times. a named animation sequence?? as opposed to what, ephemeral anonymous animation sequences?
3 replies →
What matters more is that it passes as human-written.
We don’t know, but that’s itself a good thing, isn’t it? if it is not “obvious AI slop” and looks human-written, then even if it was AI generated, that would be fine...
The text looks fine, but the image captions/titles has some AI vibes.