Comment by markasoftware
2 days ago
Yep, the linked page doesn't /feel/ AI written (maybe it's using a grok or muse model whose tone I don't quite recognize yet?) but it kinda just states a lot of facts that make sense on their own but don't cohere into a whole vulnerability like the comment above does.
I think it's just Claude prompted to write in a casual, conversational, no caps style.
The surface-level hints are gone, but the attempt to make every sentence pithy, the decisions on what information to present and what to assume the audience knows, and the over-emotionalization are all still there.
It feels very AI written, it's just not the blatantly AI default style. Pretty much any prompt with a "write X in this style: [example text]" will produce writing like this.
Of course it is. "one debian box, one alpine box" is an obvious Claudeism.
and what same human would embed two linux systems (??) in a blog post just for a demo that prints "pass"/"fail" that hardly anyone will bother to interact with?
The demo is obviously vibe-coded, but that doesn't necessarily have to mean the prose comes from Claude too (although in this case it clearly does).