Comment by Xcelerate

13 years ago

I disagree with the author. This isn't exactly a parody thread. A parody is "an imitative work created to mock, comment on or trivialise an original work" [1]. For one thing, I would hardly call Hacker News comments "original work", and a simple creation like this hardly captures the full scope and breadth of comments on here.

Furthermore, I'm not really sure why this belongs on HN, because it's not very technical, and frankly, not very intellectually stimulating. People on here don't appreciate humor, so those who upvoted this should have known better. I've flagged the article.

Also, I've never even heard of Brad Conte.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody

I'm sorry, you seem to believe you can just throw around these opinions of yours without evidence. I demand you provide me with multiple peer reviewed scientific papers from journals of note to backup your so called claims.

Frankly there's no point in even continuing this conversation until you do and we should just assume that I'm right and you're wrong.

I don't understand why you're making this so complicated. This problem can be easily solved using unix pipes. There's no need to complicate your technology stack with extraneous definitions of "parody".

I would like to piggyback off the original comment, and disagree.

>People on here don't appreciate humor

How could you possibly come to such a conclusion? I appreciate humor, and I am sure others do as well.

I know this is off-topic, but could you teach Redditors how to make funny threads? It's very funny.

How could you have used the Internet more than three times and not heard of Brad Conte?

  • Actually, if you've visited more than 3 sites on the Internet, you've probably used something he designed.