Comment by Brakenshire
11 years ago
The article in no way says this is illegitimate, it is listed as an extra barrier that a competitor would have to cross.
11 years ago
The article in no way says this is illegitimate, it is listed as an extra barrier that a competitor would have to cross.
Maybe not explicitly, but it was stated in the context of a critical article about Google's betrayal of openness, so we could at least be forgiven for interpreting it in that light. It's not a stretch to assume it was meant as a criticism.