It's not. You will detect that in many cases it is a language issue, too. If you look at Lisp, you can see that the language definitions are optimized for interactive use and have a lot of facilities defined at the language level: incremental definitions, evaluation, effects of loading code, a robust interactive error system, ...
It's not. You will detect that in many cases it is a language issue, too. If you look at Lisp, you can see that the language definitions are optimized for interactive use and have a lot of facilities defined at the language level: incremental definitions, evaluation, effects of loading code, a robust interactive error system, ...
How come it is not?
- Create an interpreter library for language X
- Offer a GUI/CLI application using the said library
Not all repls need to work at function level like LISP does.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/9446693/69545
2 replies →