Comment by bjz_
12 years ago
It was poorly expressed, but I think gnuvince was referring to the fact that it is possible to implement machine-friendly ADTs. Rust is just one example of a language that has them.
12 years ago
It was poorly expressed, but I think gnuvince was referring to the fact that it is possible to implement machine-friendly ADTs. Rust is just one example of a language that has them.
No, that's not what 'gnuvince was trying to communicate.
In fact, that's exactly what I meant, but thanks for trying to be my shrink.
I'm not your shrink, but thanks to the handy "Search" feature on the site, I had read every comment you've written that mentions Golang or Rust before I wrote that. I stand by what I wrote.
This probably isn't worth the debate, though.