Comment by aptwebapps
12 years ago
Yes, but it links, via a redirect, to the copyright holder's own website. As someone commented upthread, if they want to block it, they can.
12 years ago
Yes, but it links, via a redirect, to the copyright holder's own website. As someone commented upthread, if they want to block it, they can.
Weez got busted for using publicly available links to access private information.
Do you think that pertains here or are you being argumentative? Or do you wish to make a larger point about the idiocy of the CFAA?
Why are you being mean? You suggested that content being hosted on a copyright holder's website was enough protection. They cited an example where it wasn't. It just means the specifics of the case law are relevant here and a blanket pronouncement isn't sufficient.
3 replies →