Comment by kick
6 years ago
The Mozilla Foundation controls and owns the Mozilla Corporation, and the executive structure looks more or less the same. Baker's compensation has been inversely tied with performance, and she runs both.
6 years ago
The Mozilla Foundation controls and owns the Mozilla Corporation, and the executive structure looks more or less the same. Baker's compensation has been inversely tied with performance, and she runs both.
Owns, yes. That is radically different from "funds", though.
Not going to dispute anything about executive structure or Baker's compensation and (mis)management, but a lot of people here are acting like donations either go directly to the corporation or funnel to it through the actual recipient of the donations, but there isn't really any evidence being presented.
> Baker's compensation has been inversely tied with performance
You've mentioned this twice in the thread now. "Inversely tied" is quite a strong and unusual claim for compensation. Care to prove it?
Happily!
2.5 million, 2018:
https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2018/mozilla-2018-fo...
2.3 million, 2017:
https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2017/mozilla-2017-fo...
1 million, 2016:
https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2016/2016_Mozilla_Fo...
<1 million, 2015:
https://static.mozilla.com/moco/en-US/pdf/2015_Mozilla_Found...
Firefox market share has been in decline (30% to <5%) for over a decade now:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/61/StatCoun...
That's not "tied", which would imply a contractual relationship...
6 replies →
https://twitter.com/BrendanEich/status/1217517703914643456
Their salary has gone up, and firefox market share has gone down, its neither is a controversial statement