← Back to context Comment by october8140 5 months ago RealPage also gave recommendations. Giving a salary range seems like the same thing. 3 comments october8140 Reply cscurmudgeon 5 months ago By this logic, employees who share their salary publicly also contribute to wage fixing. Nevermark 5 months ago If it’s public there is no information asymmetry. There is no fixing. cscurmudgeon 5 months ago How?Information symmetry doesn't prevent fixing. E.g., rents are all public information.If it is public, won't employers still have access to the salary ranges for free? The very thing Pave is giving them at a cost?
cscurmudgeon 5 months ago By this logic, employees who share their salary publicly also contribute to wage fixing. Nevermark 5 months ago If it’s public there is no information asymmetry. There is no fixing. cscurmudgeon 5 months ago How?Information symmetry doesn't prevent fixing. E.g., rents are all public information.If it is public, won't employers still have access to the salary ranges for free? The very thing Pave is giving them at a cost?
Nevermark 5 months ago If it’s public there is no information asymmetry. There is no fixing. cscurmudgeon 5 months ago How?Information symmetry doesn't prevent fixing. E.g., rents are all public information.If it is public, won't employers still have access to the salary ranges for free? The very thing Pave is giving them at a cost?
cscurmudgeon 5 months ago How?Information symmetry doesn't prevent fixing. E.g., rents are all public information.If it is public, won't employers still have access to the salary ranges for free? The very thing Pave is giving them at a cost?
By this logic, employees who share their salary publicly also contribute to wage fixing.
If it’s public there is no information asymmetry. There is no fixing.
How?
Information symmetry doesn't prevent fixing. E.g., rents are all public information.
If it is public, won't employers still have access to the salary ranges for free? The very thing Pave is giving them at a cost?