← Back to context Comment by OJFord 21 hours ago The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it? 13 comments OJFord Reply avree 19 hours ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. Sabinus 19 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. OJFord 14 hours ago Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else. OJFord 14 hours ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug: southernplaces7 21 hours ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 14 hours ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason. OJFord 14 hours ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem. burnt-resistor 21 hours ago Paywalled. OJFord 14 hours ago Wasn't for me, as I said. burnt-resistor 1 hour ago No worries. Must be some regional weirdness. US here. VPN or EU over there? 1 reply → santa_boy 19 hours ago paywalled for me too OJFord 14 hours ago Wasn't for me, as I said.
avree 19 hours ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. Sabinus 19 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. OJFord 14 hours ago Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else. OJFord 14 hours ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
Sabinus 19 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. OJFord 14 hours ago Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else.
OJFord 14 hours ago Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else.
OJFord 14 hours ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
southernplaces7 21 hours ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 14 hours ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
OJFord 14 hours ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
OJFord 14 hours ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
burnt-resistor 21 hours ago Paywalled. OJFord 14 hours ago Wasn't for me, as I said. burnt-resistor 1 hour ago No worries. Must be some regional weirdness. US here. VPN or EU over there? 1 reply →
OJFord 14 hours ago Wasn't for me, as I said. burnt-resistor 1 hour ago No worries. Must be some regional weirdness. US here. VPN or EU over there? 1 reply →
burnt-resistor 1 hour ago No worries. Must be some regional weirdness. US here. VPN or EU over there? 1 reply →
Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article.
Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login.
Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else.
Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link.
Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
Paywalled.
Wasn't for me, as I said.
No worries. Must be some regional weirdness. US here. VPN or EU over there?
1 reply →
paywalled for me too
Wasn't for me, as I said.