← Back to context Comment by chickenzzzzu 6 days ago [flagged] 9 comments chickenzzzzu Reply happymellon 6 days ago How is forcing manufacturers to state that they are planning to bork your game in the future "increasing the barrier of entry"? chickenzzzzu 6 days ago If the only thing that this initiative seeks to achieve is clear and fair labeling when purchasing something, I'm all for it.If in the future, if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it. skotobaza 6 days ago > if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against itWhy? What do you personally lose because of that? 6 replies →
happymellon 6 days ago How is forcing manufacturers to state that they are planning to bork your game in the future "increasing the barrier of entry"? chickenzzzzu 6 days ago If the only thing that this initiative seeks to achieve is clear and fair labeling when purchasing something, I'm all for it.If in the future, if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it. skotobaza 6 days ago > if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against itWhy? What do you personally lose because of that? 6 replies →
chickenzzzzu 6 days ago If the only thing that this initiative seeks to achieve is clear and fair labeling when purchasing something, I'm all for it.If in the future, if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it. skotobaza 6 days ago > if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against itWhy? What do you personally lose because of that? 6 replies →
skotobaza 6 days ago > if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against itWhy? What do you personally lose because of that? 6 replies →
How is forcing manufacturers to state that they are planning to bork your game in the future "increasing the barrier of entry"?
If the only thing that this initiative seeks to achieve is clear and fair labeling when purchasing something, I'm all for it.
If in the future, if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it.
> if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it
Why? What do you personally lose because of that?
6 replies →