Comment by sharpshadow

1 month ago

It would be only just if the Palestinians would get their own state after this.

Right of return for all Palestinians and their descendants, worldwide.

  • Also for the 850K middle eastern Jews that were kicked out of their countries by arabs?

    • Kicked out? Is that what you call the One Million Plan and all the other plans like it? They were imported there because that's been the MO of the state of Israel since the Irgun and Haganah first envisioned it.

    • If committing genocide puts the genociders in a tough spot, then I’m actually cool with that

    • On genetic terms, the Palestinians are virtually identical to Semitic Jews.

      There's been plenty of slander to try to say they're more arab, but they're essentially close cousins.

      Which leads one to believe, perhaps a large amount of the jews in the region simply moved on with the times with the new religion taking hold.

      Essentially Israel/Palestine is a fight between cousins, and one side's inlaws who never actually came from the region but converted elsewhere.

      So converts vs converts. Do the local converts have a say over the foreign converts?

      The idea that land rights can be derived from the bible or spans of 1000s of years is silly, but the ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestine going back to 1945 is within living memory.

      2 replies →

  • Let's not get too far ahead of ourselves, here, that would have the stench of colonialism about it.

    It's not their land to 'return to' - after all, people already live there and they have no moral right to displace them.

    • They have been deliberately displaced by Israeli's apartheid government giving Jewish people around the world a "right to return" to Israel. Except unlike the Palestinians, they were never from Israel in the first place so the term "right to return" as used by Israel is nothing but colonialist propaganda.

      Undoing colonialism isn't colonialism.

      11 replies →

[flagged]

  • Their own land, of course, where they've lived for thousands of years.

    • Serious question, what do you think is their own land? And what exactly makes you think it is their land?

      Are you aware that most of the Arabs of the Holy Land came around the same time period as the Jews? There were Arabs living here previously, of course, as were there living here Jews. Half a century before the British mandate, Jerusalem was already Jewish majority.

        > where they've lived for thousands of years.
      

      The only reason that Jews in the West Bank are called settlers is because the Jews were ethnically cleansed from the West Bank in 1948, and that territory was free of Jews for 19 years. Other than those 19 years, the Jews had been here far longer than the Arab colonizers had been.

      25 replies →

[flagged]

  • Other commenters are right, but I'll point out another fallacy you're pushing here.

    The current situation is like somebody commits a murder. Then the community rounds up a posse and goes out to kill the murderer. Then kill the murder's family, their neighbors, the residents of the next neighborhood over, raze the neighborhoods and then take all the land for themselves.

    Justice means penalizing the guilty parties, not everyone in their geographical/social group. Your definition of Justice is leaky.

    • But isn't that what Hamas did? Broke into homes and burned babies to death? Beheaded people? Pulled fetuses from pregnant women? Shoot up clinics and murder the entire staff and patients?

      32 replies →

    • > Justice means penalizing the guilty parties, not everyone in their geographical/social group. Your definition of Justice is leaky.

      I disagree. Your definition of justice inadvertently prevents justice. Holding Hamas accountable for the thousands of rocket attacks and the mass murder / mutilation / rape of October 7 means hunting down all of them, getting rid of their weapons, and freeing hostages. You can only do so with some degree of collateral damage since they’re hiding in civilian populations.

      But also, “civilian” is debatable. It’s this same population that voted for Hamas despite their charter explicitly calling for religious genocide. It’s the same population that supports Hamas even after the mass murder / mutilation / rape of October 7, according to multiple polls. It’s the same population that has so many times turned a blind eye to the actions of Hamas.

    • You mean like we did with Germany?

      Obviously if the nazis and hamas had come out and surrendered we wouldn't have had to.

      But sometimes one has to take out evil. Be it nazis in Berlin or Hamas in Gaza.

      And it also serves as a lesson. A lesson certain countries might soon have to learn the hard way:

      don't vote for evil, and if you did, don't be the ones who line the streets to cheer for them like Germans and Gazans did.

  • You are thinking of "Palestinians" as a collective group, synonymous with a group of extremists who have done horrible things

    Just as most of the citizens of Iran are victims of an Islamic totalitarian government, just as many Germans were victims of the fascist dictatorship that took hold of their nation, most human beings living near the southeast bit of the Levantine Sea are victims of actions outside their control.

    They're collectively paying the price for horrific violence on both sides of an ugly, tragic conflict that they have no power over.

    Giving those victims some sovereignty and peace would not be "rewarding" extremists, it would be taking a tiny step towards sanity.

    • So, do we owe Germany an apology after we obliterated it to stop the nazis?

      Or is it kind of logical that when you vote actual genocidal maniacs into power and cheer for them as they return from murder and rape, you hide the hostages they took and refuse to do anything to stop them, then maybe you aren't completely innocent?

      5 replies →

  • “Now imagine this scenario and ignore everything else that’s happened for the last 60-70 years and oh yeah, don’t mention the current genocide.”

    • Let's not ignore the last 60-70 or even 1400 years.

      Israelis hit back hard. But they haven't been the ones to declare war on peaceful neighbors.

      It wasn't them who stood for thr München massacre or a number of plane hijackings in the 70ies.

      It wasn't Israelis who blew up buses in Gaza.

      Was it?

      We must stop confusing powerful with evil and currently helpless with "innocent".

      27 replies →

  • You seem to be unaware of all the Palestinian hostages Israel has been taking for decades. Thousands of people locked up without trial or charges, many of them children. Please educate yourself.

    • You don't see the difference between imprisoning people that attack you and taking care of them (mostly, exceptions sadly exist)

      and storming a music festival and houses to abduct completely innocent teenagers and even toddlers to use them for leverage?

      Honestly?

      7 replies →

  • The article is discussing "mass surveilance" of millions of phone calls per day. Whatever scenario you're trying to describe isn't at all reflective of what's being discussed here.

> It would be only just if the Palestinians would get their own state after this.

This seems off topic. I will flag it.