Comment by miladyincontrol

4 days ago

Excessive UV exposure in general not a great time, tanning is just a way of speedrunning damage unless done in very short intervals.

I'll never understand some people's fetishization with getting darker via tanning though. Theres nothing wrong with light skin, its only a few western countries that seem to have a weird fetishization with cooking your skin longterm to get darker short term. Meanwhile most other countries and peoples are willing to damage their skin in whole other ways trying to get the opposite.

They're both imitations of status symbols

"wealthy people can stay inside while poor people work in the sun" vs. "wealthy people can vacation in sunny countries while poor people stay home in the cold"

The popularity of tanning is attributed to fashion designer Coco Chanel, who accidentally got too much sun on a Mediterranean cruise in 1923. Since she was a fashion icon, this made the tanned look fashionable.

As an aside, the chemistry behind UV damage is interesting. You can think of DNA as a sequence of four letters: C, G, A, and T. If there are two neighboring T's, UV can move a bond, linking the two T's together (i.e. thymine dimerization). If you're in the sun, each skin cell gets 50-100 of these pairs created per second. Enzymes usually fix these errors, but sometimes the errors will cause problems during DNA replication and you can end up with mutations. Enough of the wrong mutations can cause skin cancer. So wear sunscreen!

https://pdb101.rcsb.org/motm/91

I’m naturally pretty pale and don’t get much sunlight, I feel like I look like shit unless I get just a little bit of tan. What most people would consider just a healthy looking “baseline”. It also puts me in a better mood although that may be entirely psychological.

When I was younger I used to intentionally tan for short durations, but now I realize that’s harmful so I just embrace the cave gollum look

  • I am white as paper, probably one of the palest people and I live in Asia and often get comment that I have the dream skin. While back at home my parents were teasing me about being a ghost and doctors asking am I sick. Interesting how it changes on cultural basis

    • I think it’s more than just cultural. Yes, it’s definitely a factor, and there are cultures and there were times where paper white was considered beautiful.

      But I think on some level we naturally associate severe paleness with being sick or non-social.

      I say this as the original commenter

      1 reply →

  • The mood is probably part light and part vitamin D. The latter can be supplemented. The former can be reproduced with a full spectrum bright lamp or brief sun exposure in the morning.

    • I've tried all kinds of Vitamin D/bright bulbs/staring at the sun over the years and they do nothing for my mood

    • I mean sort of but you should probably just get some sun if you can. There’s such a thing as too much tanning, sure, but getting no sun is not healthy either.

      1 reply →

  • Why don't you just spend time outside a little bit?

    • Exposing large amounts of skin to the sun has other health risks when it is freezing outside. :)

      Vitamin D deficiency is very common in Canada particularly during winter. The government recommends that everyone intentionally seek out vitamin D rich foods, or to take a supplement.

Cosmetic companies to blame? In the east, they fetishize white / fair skin, while in the west they fetishize dark skin.

  • Possibly. Its actually insanely frustrating as someone pale that most western brands rarely approach the level of lightness I need to match my skin, and the few that come close often are almost always rather saturated, highly warm tones.

    They almost always just stick to tones within the realm of pantone's skin guide, treating it more like a skin bible instead.

    Haus labs and their triclone in 000 is one of the few foundations I've ever had match.

    • People with dark skin do also still struggle to find their tones in most western countries unless they live in a huge city.

You can always use Melanotan II instead to get a good tan while also increasing libido and sleep quality; )

> I'll never understand some people's fetishization with getting darker

> ...

> Meanwhile most other countries and peoples are willing to damage their skin in whole other ways trying to get the opposite.

The grass has more melanin on the other side.

  • But that's the thing, it's not about "more melanin", but rather about something like:

    The grass on the other side has a different amount of melanin be harder-to-achieve and thus more desirable because it previously signaled belonging to the higher socio-economical strata.

It's indeed, baffling, ignoring health consequences: Get fashionably darker skin now: Make your skin look (reasonably universally) irreversibly uglier/older gradually over time. This is perhaps the most controllable way to affect how old you look.

It becomes unmissable once someone is in their 30s: Some still have youthful skin, while others are wrinkly, splotched, and saggy.

> I'll never understand some people's fetishization with getting darker via tanning though

While some darker skin people want to have lighter skin.

Maybe at some deeper level it’s something about being human. We always want something the other person has

  • I'm pretty sure it's just cultural. They don't want to be fairer, or darker, they want the social status that it, allegedly, signals.

And what's funny is Western countries idolise tanned skin whereas Asian countries tend to idolise lighter skin.