← Back to context

Comment by nhumrich

2 days ago

Might be corrupt, but is at least closer to truth then the last corrupted version. Let's not let perfect be the enemy of progress

The incentives are wrong. Any good policy for bad incentives is temporary and incidental

This policy selectively emphasizes the most difficult to import foods so it also plays into isolationist nativist policies.

If you think meat lobbying groups just wanted a new triangle and this isn't going to extend to water, land, energy, and environmental policies along with farm subsidies and even merger&acquisition and liability policies, sorry ...

This thing is for them, their profitability and their investors. They didn't lobby on behalf of your personal health...

Open a position on the MOO ETF. I just did. Might as well make some money from it

  • wrong incentives, good outcomes? is there a world where the long term outcomes are also good, or at least much better than the current ones?

    also, hi there! (da from oblong)

    • Sure. What about the public citizen efforts for crumple zone and seat belts in the 1960s?

      Or are you saying bad incentives, good long term outcomes?

      Maybe Napoleon's rework of Paris? That was done to control public dissidents but it also made it a beautiful city.

      Mass timekeeping? Those were adopted for industrial labor... Seems to be quite useful

      Joint stock ownership was I think invented for the slave trade but that's proven to be generally useful.

      I think magnetic audio tape was made practical for a deceitful technique by the Nazis for claiming to be broadcasting live on the radio after they had fled...

      In each of these instances though the thing long outlived the initial user

Is it? The change in recommendation is to have less veggies in favor of more meat. From all the recent research and meta studies I've seen it doesn't track.

It's still decent a guidance, but the previous one was as well.

  • The first food group listed is literally meat and dairy. The ordering here is purposeful, too, as they admit. One promo graphic includes a block of butter and a carton explicitly labelled "whole milk." This is a very definite downgrade.

    • Butter is king. It should be pictured with a crown, stars and glitter.

      Surely whole milk is better than less-than-whole milk?

    • "The first food group listed is literally meat and dairy."

      that's because the pyramid is presented pointy end down.

    • You're literally just lying.

      The first thing shown on the website is - broccoli.

      The top of the pyramid includes both protein (meat, cheese) as well as fruits & vegetables.

      The reason that meat is shown first is probably that it's the bigger change (it's been demonized in previous versions), whereas vegetables were always prominent.

      4 replies →

  • And that's going to dictate nationwide purchasing policies for things the the 30 million school lunch meals, million prisoners...

    This is worth millions of dollars a day and we're sold it as common wisdom from the mom and pop country doctor.

  • And here in largely vegetarian India, everyone is now pushing for more protein and meats because a vegetable-heavy diet has been awful for our public health

    • Even if Indians ate 2x the meat that they do now, they wouldn’t consume anywhere as much as Americans do. Increasing meat consumption in America is not necessary.

      India would do well to consume more protein, and the US would do well to consume less

    • has your government published any science on this? being completely serious, i'd like to read it. Is India mostly vegetarian because of lack of access to farms/meats, religious reasons, financial, or what? I didn't know it was largely vegetarian. I don't know i had an idea of the ratio or that it would be different than any other country.

      Apparently the Mediterranean also is largely vegetarian. at least the eponymous diet is.

      2 replies →

>but is at least closer to truth then [than?] the last corrupted version

I'm pretty sure you did the rhetorical equivalent of looking at a roomful of pregnant high school girls..

.. and declaring one of them to be closest to virginity.