Comment by jimbokun
1 day ago
I would not say that Charlie Brown is untouched by failure. He does descend to the depths of despair. But some how rises from it to try (and fail) again. This trope is seen best with Lucy pulling away the football every time he goes to kick it. Even though he knows he's failed every time, he talks himself into this time being different.
This does not contradict your overriding point, just adding nuance to the claim he is "simply not touched by failure".
I suspect that one difference that gives the impression that the characters in Peanuts are "untouched by failure" is that for the most part they don't have real character arcs. Once their archetypes are established they stay the same. Combine that with being the longest running comic written by a single person of all time and it feels like nothing ever changes.
That's not a critique - being a comforting source of unchanging familiarity is part of the point of a newspaper comic. But it is very different to H2G. Arthur Dent might be a bumbling failure who is flung around by forces out of his own control, but his life still changes and he still changes. He still grows a little bit as a person.
But Charlie is a fool, a half-moron. Arthur is not dumb.
Charlie Brown is a child.
Surprised I had to read this far down the thread to find this comment.
Sorta. The whole point of the strip is that they don't talk or act like children.
"Schultz" is German for "brown". He's very much the author's adult POV, using a child-looking character to disarm the cynicism.
3 replies →